Friday, October 15, 2010

World traveling photojournalist Jay Dickman and his Singh-Ray ND Grads work well together

As a versatile photojournalist and instructor/lecturer aboard the National Geographic Expeditions, Jay Dickman has literally covered the world. He always carries his Singh-Ray Graduated Neutral Density filters wherever he travels. "Here’s the perfect example," he says, "of a scene in which my ND Grads made a fine image out of an otherwise impossible lighting situation.

"During a recent expedition to the Galapagos Islands, we spent a late afternoon on the island of Santiago. We came upon a female sea lion with a wandering pup (I don’t think it was hers) and a marine iguana. In terms of the light, it was one of those late afternoon scenes in which the light was dramatic but spread over an extremely wide dynamic range. Although our eyes could enjoy the scene, the strong light from the western sky was well beyond the capability of any camera to capture.

"This image is an exposure without any filter. Obviously, I had to choose between exposing for the sky, which would leave the foreground too dark, or exposing correctly for the foreground and thereby losing most of the detail in the sky. One possible solution might have been to just go ahead and photograph the scene and attempt to pull in as much of the highlight detail as possible by using Photoshop, or I might have made 3 images at different exposures and used HDR to combine the best exposed parts of each image file. Any movement in this scene, however, could have caused ghosting or registration problems when it came to merging the three images.

"After years of successfully capturing images with such high dynamic ranges, I knew my best choice was to 'stack' together two of my tried and true Singh-Ray ND Grads -- a two-stop hard-step and a two-stop soft-step -- to 'bring down' the sky’s very high light values. By offsetting the gradient areas of the two filters, I was able to use the sharp definition of the hard step to hold back the light from both the sea and sky, then adjusted the soft-step filter to allow the clouds to increase in value gradually. As we see by the image at the top of this story, this quick and easy step allowed my digital camera to capture the scene much more closely to how my eyes saw it.

"This example supports my long-held belief that the photographer is better served by capturing the best possible image of the scene as it appears in front of the camera, without going into post production and spending additional hours trying to make up for exposure issues that could have been better addressed in the camera."

In addition to his frequent contributions to many leading news, travel and sports publications and his ventures with Lindblad/National Geographic, Jay currently hosts his own series of FirstLight digital photography workshops in locations around the world. To see more of Jay's images, visit www.jaydickman.net or check out his workshop schedule at www.firstlightworkshop.com

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

E.J. Peiker provides helpful insight into polarizers and two ways they can improve our images

Always willing -- as well as qualified -- to discuss the technical challenges serious photographers face, veteran photographer E.J. Peiker has a lot to say about the importance of polarizers. "My Singh-Ray LB Neutral Polarizers spend the majority of their time mounted on my landscape photography lenses, and are an important creative and artistic tool in my photographic toolbox. However, in my experience, I've found there are a lot of photographers who don't really understand how polarizers work, when to use them, and how to use them most effectively. Then there are those, unfortunately, who believe they understand, but can't figure out why their polarizer isn't doing what they expect it to. So let's discuss how a polarizer works and the two basic ways it's able to help us produce more beautiful pictures.



"Let's first take a look at light and how a polarizer affects it. Naturally occurring daylight, as well as most artificial light, is composed of waves that radiate outward in all directions. When these radiating waves are aligned into one or more planes, the light becomes polarized. In a photograph taken without a polarizer, reflections such as those from a wet leaf are scattered (unpolarized) resulting in a glare that reduces color saturation and hides the structural details of the leaf. Similarly, as the sun shines through all of the particulate in the atmosphere, the light is scattered in all directions resulting in an effect similar to a light fog filter that scatters light and thereby reduces color saturation.

"When we put a polarizer on the front of our lens (or behind it in the case of some super telephoto lenses), we now have a tool that can align the light into a plane and reduce the scatter of light reaching the camera's digital sensor or film plane. A polarizer does this as the result of a chemical compound coating applied on the glass or optical resin that has molecules which are naturally aligned in parallel to each other. This coating allows passage only of the light oriented in the plane that is parallel to the molecules' orientation, thereby eliminating the glare that would be caused by all the light that isn't aligned to that plane. You can see this glare-reducing effect by looking through the filter as you rotate it.

"What I have described above is a 'linear' polarizer similar to the lenses in polarized sunglasses. Linear polarizers work very well at polarizing the light and increasing color saturation, but they can fool the automatic focusing and/or metering systems in many modern cameras that rely on beam splitters which, by their very nature, are polarizing. If the light hitting the beam splitter (usually embedded in the camera's mirror) is not polarized in the same direction as the beam splitter, it sees little or no light and therefore the camera cannot autofocus or meter accurately. The solution is to apply a second polarizing layer onto the filter behind the polarizing layer that essentially cancels out the polarization. Since the offending light from the scene that you are photographing has already been filtered out, this is not an issue and does not significantly degrade the image. This type of filter is called a 'circular' polarizer.



"Now that we have a rudimentary understanding of how a polarizing filter works, we need to consider when and how to use it. Many photographers only have a partial understanding of this, thinking a polarizer exists only to darken a blue sky. Some overlook how effectively a polarizer can remove reflected glare off wet and shiny surfaces, and the important benefits that offers.

"First, let's look at polarizing the light from the open sky to increase saturation of the blue or to darken the sky. Polarizers are most effective at doing this when the camera is pointed 90 degrees away from the sun. For example, with the sun rising in the east, maximum polarization of the open sky will be achieved if the camera is pointed north or south. This can pose a problem when using wide angle lenses, especially those that are 28mm or wider (full frame 35mm equivalent). With these lenses, due to their wide angle of view, the intensity of the blue in different parts of the sky can appear uneven. There are simple solutions to this 'dark-spot' dilemma.

"Some photographers will get frustrated with the uneven effect and just take off the polarizer. A better solution is to rotate the polarizer enough so that the effect is completely gone -- or to turn the polarizer part way to a point where the difference is less noticeable. Many photographers I have worked with believe the proper way to use a polarizer is to look through the viewfinder and turn the polarizer until the sky is as dark as it can be. This is simply not the case. It's wiser to 'tune' the polarizer to get the most desirable effect in the viewfinder or on your Live View screen. By doing this, any obvious dark area can be eliminated and in some cases you can still get some polarization effect before the dark spot is noticeable. At higher elevations, the effect of polarization can be quite dramatic since the sunlight is less scattered by the thinner atmosphere and there are fewer atmospheric pollutants and particulate. This is another time when you will want to back off on the polarization a bit to avoid an overly dark and unnatural looking sky.

"Perhaps my most frequent use of polarization is to remove sheen from vegetation and rocks. It's not just the atmosphere that scatters light. Many wet uneven surfaces also scatter light and thereby reduce color saturation dramatically. Waterfalls, leaves, and just about anything non-metallic that reflects light can scatter the light and reduce color saturation. By using a polarizer whenever you're photographing light-reflecting surfaces, you can really give your photos a nice color pop. And in the case of waterfalls, the 1-1/3 to 2-stop reduction in exposure level can result in a longer shutter speed and a more veiled look to the water. (For an even more dramatic veiling effect, try adding a neutral density filter, but that's another article.) Adjusting the polarizer in these situations is best done visually. Just turn the polarizer until you have the color saturation the way you like it. With wet rocks and vegetation this will generally be at the maximum polarization point. With waterfalls, the temptation to maximize the polarization is always there, but sometimes this can cause some water that is flowing in shallow ponds or over rocks to completely disappear. In such cases, you may want to back off just a little by turning the polarizer down a bit.



"Another common mistake I see photographers making with polarizers is over-polarizing a scene when the foreground includes a pond or lake that is reflecting the image of mountains, canyon walls, or cloud-filled sky in the background. Imagine sitting in the early morning at the edge of a totally calm alpine lake with a beautiful reflection of the snow-capped mountain in the lake. Too often a photographer in this situation will dial in maximum polarization, which actually has the effect of reducing the reflection in the lake substantially. By backing off a bit on the polarization, one can still get a darkening of the sky and a reduction in reflections off wet rocks without removing too much of the beautiful reflection.

"These examples are all nature photos since this is the main type of work that I do, but the same holds true for other situations. Whether you're shooting buildings, portraits, products, sports, aerials, or just about anything, polarizers can offer similar benefits. For example, try taking some photographs of your car as you vary the polarization -- you will see some dramatic effects, and due to the complex lines of most cars, you'll see there is no one 'right' polarizer setting, but rather that different settings will give different effects. The right setting is whatever yields the most pleasing results, and this applies in any situation."

Widely recognized for his collection of waterfowl photographs, E.J. is currently engaged in creating artistic landscape images of the world's great scenic wonders. You'll find an impressive array of more than 6,000 images of landscapes, wildlife and birds from five continents on his personal website. He is also the co-founder and technical editor for the on-line photo magazine NatureScapes.net.